Alien Profiteering for Cosmic Engineering
Aliens, as in cosmic visitors, provokes all manner of human reactivity. Here, the characterization has nothing to do with human creatures seeking asylum or other amenities from a great number country. Instead, the focus is interplanetary. Likewise, traveling the universe inspires a variety of notions. As to how such things happen, science collides with science fiction. Many questions arise. With that, quite a few have opinions. in addition, bottom-line, among humans interested in this particular field of query, as in questions usually asked by criminologists, who stand to profit. That is to say, for those in the vicinity of investigative inquiry, where is the gain. That comes from the classical spectrum of criminology, dealing with victim, suspects and perpetrators.
In the business of selling one theory after another, particularly those of an extraterrestrial variety, there is exceptional profit possible. Capitalizing on ignorance, paranoia and primordial self-interests, provides lucrative remunerations for skillful entrepreneurs. Setting aside the great range of conspiracy theories, the “alien agenda” attracts much interest by most people. From successful novels to television Sci-Fi portrayals, “ufology” is extraordinarily popular with huge segments of the population. In fact, much of what of the speculation about other worldly visitors comes from fictional supplies. One could begin with early western space fiction in the late 19th century. Creative authors imagined fascinating cosmic adventures.
From there, any assessment of the profit possible in storytelling, as it relates to alien travelers, is likely a lot of guesswork. However, there is an illusion among some writers. For the author, regarding the possible for moneymaking from writing stories about science fiction and fantasy, the probability is enormous success is low. On the production side, for an assortment of individual and corporate media companies, the possible is slightly different. With the internet, in addition as various competing streaming sets, conspiracy theories abound in a variety of forms. According to one noticeable financial news source, media sets eagerly promote “conspiratorial concepts”. If it sells, it does not matter what the evidence shows, or the scientific validation.
consequently, one traditional magazine put the calculate of “UFO believers” in the range of about two thirds of the American population. The likelihood of a higher correlation is probably a good assumption. consequently, approximately three out of every four Americans accept the concept of alien lifeforms, with approximately one in three believing aliens have visited earth.
Given that belief systems vary, and motivations are different, one aspect that stands out permeates the social strata. Making a living from “UFO occurrences. One online blog indicates that not everyone profits, but some do very well. By writing books, gaining a following and grabbing international notoriety, along with media promotions, a few make the genre lucrative. In furthering the discussion concerning the “alien agenda”, another aspect involves constructing a cosmos teaming with life everywhere. This concept, aside from any monetary advantages for one person or another, is a more fascinating temptation. One online science forum for example mentioned the “Fermi Paradox”. This suggest the contrast between the without of scientific evidence and the probability of other life forms in the cosmic order. Where are the aliens?
Better in addition, where is the data? In other words, what scientific hardcore validation produces the viability of proof beyond any doubt? Perhaps in post-modern America that is too extreme. Forget that nonsense about evidentiary criteria. Presently there appears a resurgence of not only anti-intellectualism, but also anti-science thinking. insignificant speculation based on eyewitness testimony, as an example, is insufficient. Logically speaking, bias influences conclusions at every opportunity, while the observer influences his or her observations. Opinions, rumors, hearsay, and gossip offer nothing of consistent provable data to substantiate probabilities. As suggested by one scientist, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.
As to science, here the inference is in favor of those areas such as astrophysics, astronomy, biology, chemistry, and physics to name a few. Often, some call this vicinity the “hard sciences”. Meanwhile, in the alleged “soft sciences”, or protestations of the pseudosciences, philosophies thrive in the areas of criminology, psychology, sociology and theology. While a few freely let in the sphere of the “social studies” areas are not hard sciences, others cringe, as they desperately want consideration as a “scientist”. In that dominion, debates can rage as to whom is the most scientific, others can estimate who cares. in spite of, evidence remains basic.
In the imaginative processes of thinking, many people are quite creative. So far, for a majority of alien adherents, the inventiveness of cosmic engineering designs a universe teeming with all kinds of life forms. With billions of possible habitats, why not? Unfortunately, again hard evidence does not suffice the near religious conviction of science fiction enthusiasts. In this reference, several researchers provide commentary for the assertion that alien aficionados pursue a “theological” conviction for progressive cosmic species. Elevated to a divine state of intergalactic supremacy, believers place humans in a subservient role to alien ascendancy.
For this discussion, the term “profit” is not limited to the monetary motive alone. Instead, the application applies to any form of gain derived from promoting, recommending or otherwise proselytizing a cosmic or supernatural perspective. Notably, this doe not average there is anything wrong with any belief system as an individualized personal point of view. at the minimum for the time being, in America, everyone is entitled to her or his outlook. Alternatively, when “profitability” and intolerance for opposing perspectives go into the public arena, problems arise. Disputes and disagreements in communal discourse ought to allow for the reasonable engagement. All too often, in current mainstream, dangerous condescension quickly devolves discussion.
in spite of, conspiracy theories of one form or another abound in great abundance, particularly in the allegedly “highly educated” U.S. population. Revisit that for a moment. Logical skepticism, strengthened by scientific and forensic examination seems woefully deficient in the “postmodern” American framework. While some potentially continue amazing radiance in niche or domain subsets, areas of particular skill, outside that, ignorance astounds the few. From alien DNA creating humans to 21st century “sociopolitical tribalism”, many pursue a claim to fame. Fake news, scheming hoaxes and all manner of hucksterism manifest an range of con artistry.
In a devolving society, allowing that supposition for the moment, not much in terms of intellectual advancement has a high probability of exception. The great stretches to global ramifications further the conceptualization of an intellectually eroding population. As to the opportunistic possibilities, criminals of every sort take advantage of targets of opportunity. Social media is rife with foolish pretentiousness of “tubular selfie-isms”. By “tubular”, the verbiage intends reference to those who feel the need to characterize themselves in a podcast recreation of them. For “them”, metaphorically inferring an different form of self-centeredness.
A tube, a podcast, a video channel in some streaming service boasts the superficially of limited knowledge and understanding of the mysteriousness surrounding the world. Not to forget of course, the character of exceptionality. in addition, exceptions to a concept of rampant social media foolishness, and the spread of erroneous commentary, is a small percentage. At basic junctures of communal battles for truth versus fiction, where facts become bothersome distractions, desired needs for self-validation rage rampantly. Mental conflicts struggle against the realization that growing up and developing mature self-evolving change requires extraordinary discipline. For most people, adolescence embraces the cowardice of refusing to transform. Personal liberation in every aspect of individual ideation is a frightening prospect for nearly everyone.
Again, exceptionality applies. Disengagement from the position quo, the contrived consensus and the enforced normality, is psychically rebellious and invites retaliation. at all event is defined as “normal” depends on the range of communal acceptance. At any given time, resistance is not futile in the sense that acceptance of consequences is understood. in addition, many cowards crawl the scenery of social interactivity. From selfie neediness in self-promoting “tube shows”, to pretentious pontifications of “opining blogs”, the ruse of anti-science faux intellectualism fogs the air of social discourse. Foolishness abounds with rabid proliferation via shallow mimicry in the excessive use of techno gadgetry. Ignorance in self-importance wears many disguises.
In echoes of the past, an assertion that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence, for most that is quickly overshadowed by retaliatory invective. In response to a probable rational inquiry, hunting for the evidentiary validation, many will do little to expand, enhance or otherwise enhance their innate abilities beyond the pseudo-intellectual babble of social media. For none of those with the strength to exemplify an enlightened ascendency will demonstrate exceptionality of honorable personality. Its too personal, much material gain or psychic fame profane any inclination to the bravery of differentiation. Selfishness is far too basic an basic necessity for many, if not most often the accompanying example. The blasphemy of stupidity spreads everywhere.
For the serious, that is to say, the mature grownup and self-evolving investigator, profound non self-serving objectivity is a powerful force to harness. As bias most always influences the conjecture of generalized conclusions. An observer of occurrence typically infuses later notions with his or her bias, prejudices and personal dysfunctions. In the pseudosciences, the “social studies” arena, particularly criminology, psychology, sociology and theology, extraordinary bias contributes a varied of nebulous notions. Anecdotal speculation, opined self-importance, and exaggerated so-called “peer review” blur the efficacy of scientific validation.
Meanwhile, maturity keeps watch near the playpen in the nursery of infantile ideas.
Maturation in the investigative course of action moves beyond the begin again’, or the curriculum vitae in the unnecessary advocacy of personal adulation. No title or rank supersedes the vitality of hardcore X-rated, in the confront flush of provable scientific sufficiency. Nonetheless, the wonderful world of creative fiction, in movies, television, books and short stories, portrays the improbable as the probable. For which, many, including those who ought to know better, salaciously desire the fiction of “fact”. Subjective validation in hopefulness for the fabrication to be reality permeates the great reaches of the societal mainstream. Social media enjoys complicity.
In view of the abundance of fake news, social media distortion and mainstream media sales propaganda, profiteering on ignorance is extremely lucrative. Such deliberate position quo enforcement of ideological superficiality and ethical inconsistency contrives a varied of intellectual challenges. While this remains one size of foolish narcissism, the infantile self-interests span many other spectrums of societal connectedness. Within multigenerational life cycles, other dimensional factors collusively mix educational processes, institutional environments, governmental mechanisms, and various forms of consumptive consumerism. Along with the great reach of entertainment venues, movies and television play a big role.
The discerning inquisitor faces monumental quests in sifting by the enormous amounts of data to uncover the reality of factual authenticity. Every day in every techno way, flows of sound bites filled with ads, commercials, apps, promos, etc., fog the awakened state of consciousness. Alleged documentaries, pretentious “news” stories, and movie making science fiction boast a variety of other worldly manifestation. There is a reason fiction is called fiction, particularly when it comes to the vicinity of pseudoscience. It’s a fabrication, untruth and deliberate misrepresentation of reality. in addition, most people will accept fictional portrayals as seemingly quasi-truthfulness. Few people insist upon a reasonable level of skepticism and a healthy sense of objectivity.
In the 21st, belief in the paranormal, the supernatural and the extraterrestrial has grown. Ghosts, goblins, gremlins and little green space creatures garner daily attention across a wide swath of society. According to a major university study in 2015, in spite of of advances in the technology, the great majority of the population cling to a variety of supernatural beliefs. More than two thirds, or abut 73% of the American population believe in “other worldly” manifestations. According to that study, in addition as others, “alien issues”, from UFO’s to abductions and visitations, fall within those beliefs. As conspiracy theories abound, aliens play a central role in the deception.
The profit is in the prophet, and the prophecy is the conspiracy for the fabrication of wishful thinking. Realizing of course that “profit” has many aspects, from the psycho vicinity to the great sphere of materiality. Transcending the metaphorical implication of alien profiteering for cosmic engineering, the inference inclines toward the multiplicity of illicit conspiracies. Rampant throughout the west in particular, where intellectual achievement is a hallmark of social blaster and academic blather, remains the salacious gratification of conspiratorial flirtations. In the macabre fascination of politicians, pundits and priestly proselytes, the unscientific and inexperienced “influencers”, most will pursue the misdirection of their celebrity worship.
For so long as gain is the sensual claim to fame, the essence of rational reality devolves to they mystic notions of collective gratification at any cost. A kind of cosmic collective hedonism spreads throughout social media as though everyone is “expert” in the different vicinity of the sciences. Not only that, but a insignificant selfish framework of ideological totalitarianism sweeps the “infotainment” networks in counterproductive intolerance. In general, the “alien conspiracy” aids the extensive conglomeration of one fake claim after another, and is representative of a devolving culture. As some would assert, many people willingly surrender shared sense for self-interest.
As to “alien profiteering”, it is a typecast, a euphemism, and a reworded understatement of public pabulum to pacify the ignorance of a devolving age. Collectively hedonist, the rush to consume endlessly all manner of “self-medicating” escapism, an externality of blame and shame degrades the very character of truthful investigative intellectual processes. Not to be seen as different, accepting the position quo unquestionably, embracing unproved consensus, and cowering in complicity, most will assemble in the crowded halls of hasty generalizations. To satiate fears instead of improvement intellectual ascension, emotional reactivity evades logical consistency.
Nonetheless, the gurus of material gain, perpetrate the sleight of hand legerdemain whenever profitably possible. There will always be followers without question who willfully pursue their own confirmation bias in the illusion of personal affirmation. In one study, a flashback to the past suggested that scholars, from the sphere of anthropological investigation, nearly 75 years ago, expected that “irrational supernatural” thinking would erode toward higher reaches of rational scientific investigative inquiry. However, such a prediction, instead, faded to the constant rise of the hunt for phantoms, ghosts, and Martians. Logical thinking suffers painfully.
One study indicates, out of an academic pursuit, that normality for Americans includes a strong belief in other worldly things. Seemingly, a conjecture might claim that for many people, believing in themselves in not a particularly vital factor. Instead, embracing things outside the extraordinary character of human possible is preferred. As intellectual pursuits slowly fade, the enormous reliance on social media, techno-gadgetry and magical thinking, takes the place of basic examination.
With the enormous availability of “cosmic” entertainment method, like books, movies, television shows, and so forth, it is all too easy to let others do the thinking. Binge watching the “magic” unfold in a pseudoscientific drama, while clinging to the rush of cell phone digitation, provides the wonderfully shallow fulfillment of amative excitation. As celestial dimensions of biased intentions satiate alien profiteering for cosmic engineering reality fades to the shadows.